type -a
I mentioned previously
that which -a
is what you want to use to find what command you’re about to run.
I was wrong.
I found accidentally, probably while reading something on stackoverflow, that
type -a
is a better-in-every-way replacement for which -a
. Compare:
Not only does type -a
give me all the same information, but it also tells me
about aliases and functions. Consider what happens for functions which do
not have corresponding executables in the PATH:
It tells me it’s a function and it shows me its definition. type -a
has decreased,
substantially, the amount of grepping my dotfiles trying to remember how certain
functions work.